Forum: CAT Tools Technical Help
Topic: Efficiency of using CAT tools in comparison to using none
Poster: DZiW
Post title: lecanomancy statistics
Does some 25% of 75%-100% fuzzy matches really imply about 25% faster, I wonder?
How one could compare the speed, leveraging the TM, when there's no 'average' speed per segment, let alone a control group?
Shouldn't one consider re-reading, revising, editing, and proving too?
How intense is the measurand?
It's like saying: [i]"Now I'm walking 2.543% slower than yesterday, yet 6733.789% faster than initially!"[/i]
[Edited at 2018-08-19 07:55 GMT]
Topic: Efficiency of using CAT tools in comparison to using none
Poster: DZiW
Post title: lecanomancy statistics
Does some 25% of 75%-100% fuzzy matches really imply about 25% faster, I wonder?
How one could compare the speed, leveraging the TM, when there's no 'average' speed per segment, let alone a control group?
Shouldn't one consider re-reading, revising, editing, and proving too?
How intense is the measurand?
It's like saying: [i]"Now I'm walking 2.543% slower than yesterday, yet 6733.789% faster than initially!"[/i]
[Edited at 2018-08-19 07:55 GMT]
