Forum: CAT Tools Technical Help
Topic: Xbench for QA - do you like it?
Poster: Martin Henderson
Post title: For me Studio's built-in QA module is best
I looked into xbench a few years back after a customer insisted I use it for a project, but I really didn't like the user interface or layout. It just doesn't seem very intuitive or user-friendly. I don't really see what is wrong with the built-in QA module that comes with Studio, it seems to be a pretty powerful and highly customisable tool in itself. Why pay out more if Studio already has a very decent QA tool built in? I always run a spell-check and then click the "Verify" button to pull up the QA function before I hand in the translation. Does the job well.
Topic: Xbench for QA - do you like it?
Poster: Martin Henderson
Post title: For me Studio's built-in QA module is best
I looked into xbench a few years back after a customer insisted I use it for a project, but I really didn't like the user interface or layout. It just doesn't seem very intuitive or user-friendly. I don't really see what is wrong with the built-in QA module that comes with Studio, it seems to be a pretty powerful and highly customisable tool in itself. Why pay out more if Studio already has a very decent QA tool built in? I always run a spell-check and then click the "Verify" button to pull up the QA function before I hand in the translation. Does the job well.